{"id":2718,"date":"2026-10-10T14:06:14","date_gmt":"2026-10-10T14:06:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/?p=2718"},"modified":"2026-10-10T14:06:14","modified_gmt":"2026-10-10T14:06:14","slug":"brad-birds-long-awaited-ray-gunn-takes-shape-at-abbey-road","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/?p=2718","title":{"rendered":"Brad Bird\u2019s Long-Awaited \u2018Ray Gunn\u2019 Takes Shape at Abbey Road"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On a balmy April afternoon, the hallowed air of Abbey Road Studios\u2019 Studio One\u2014a space that has hosted everyone from Edward Elgar to Harry Styles\u2014is filled with the sweeping, complex textures of a 74-piece orchestra. Violinists, cellists, flautists, and an organist are meticulously working through the score for <em>Ray Gunn<\/em>, a long-gestating feature animation from Pixar visionary Brad Bird. The iconic room, currently bathed in a vibrant \u201cToy Story\u201d blue, serves as the perfect backdrop for a film that feels like a culmination of decades of creative dreaming. For Bird, the mastermind behind industry-defining hits like <em>Ratatouille<\/em> and <em>The Incredibles<\/em>, this project represents more than just another entry in his filmography; it is a labor of love that has occupied his thoughts for thirty years.<\/p>\n<p>The film, which is set to premiere at the BFI London Film Festival on October 10 before a wide release on Netflix on December 18, is a Skydance Animation production. This shift away from his traditional home at Pixar is notable, marking a new chapter for the director. Leading the orchestra with surgical precision is Michael Giacchino, the Oscar-winning composer whose creative partnership with Bird has become one of the most storied collaborations in modern cinema. <em>Ray Gunn<\/em> marks their sixth project together, a professional alliance that began with 2004\u2019s <em>The Incredibles<\/em>. For Giacchino, who took home an Academy Award for <em>Up<\/em> in 2010, this score is the product of over two decades of anticipation. \u201cWe talked about this movie during <em>The Incredibles<\/em>,\u201d Giacchino reveals. \u201cI\u2019ve known about this for a very long time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The genesis of <em>Ray Gunn<\/em> is rooted in an unlikely source: a song. Bird explains that the idea for the film\u2014a noir detective caper set in a \u201cJetsons-style\u201d retro-future\u2014struck him after he heard The B-52s\u2019 song \u201cPlanet Claire.\u201d To Bird, the track possessed a unique auditory quality that felt like a collision between the iconic, driving theme of the 1960s detective series <em>Peter Gunn<\/em> and the atmosphere of a 1950s sci-fi monster flick. \u201cI went, \u2018This is not <em>Peter Gunn<\/em>. What is this?\u2019\u201d Bird recalls. \u201cAnd then I went, \u2018It\u2019s Ray-Gun.\u2019 And then I went, \u2018<em>Ray Gunn<\/em>: It\u2019s a guy\u2019s name. He\u2019s a detective, but it\u2019s in the future.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Despite this clear creative spark, the project spent years in the shadows as Bird\u2019s career path took him through a series of high-profile assignments. Over the decades, his schedule was filled by his second Pixar project, <em>Ratatouille<\/em>, followed by <em>The Incredibles 2<\/em>, and live-action ventures such as <em>Mission: Impossible \u2013 Ghost Protocol<\/em> and <em>Tomorrowland<\/em>. During this period, he also navigated an abandoned attempt to adapt Will Eisner\u2019s <em>The Spirit<\/em>. Bird, who describes his mind as a \u201cbig shop floor,\u201d admits that he would frequently return to <em>Ray Gunn<\/em> to \u201ctinker\u201d with the concept, waiting for the right moment and the right home. The project had, at various times, been pitched to and stalled at other major studios, including Warner Bros., leaving the detective story in a state of suspended animation.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"article-inline-figure\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/variety.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/10\/Ray-Gunn.jpg?w=1000&amp;h=563&amp;crop=1\" alt=\"Brad Bird on Why He Took \u2018Ray Gunn\u2019 to Skydance Instead of Pixar: Making Animated Films for Teens and Adults \u2018Shouldn\u2019t Be a Controversial Decision\u2019\" class=\"article-inline-img\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/figure>\n<p>The path to completion finally opened through the <em>Mission: Impossible<\/em> franchise. After helming <em>Ghost Protocol<\/em>, which was Skydance\u2019s second feature, the studio was reportedly pleased with the result. When the opportunity arrived to pitch a new concept to the team, <em>Ray Gunn<\/em> was the natural, long-awaited choice. The move also facilitated a professional reunion between Bird and Skydance Animation head John Lasseter.<\/p>\n<p>The decision to take the film to Skydance rather than Pixar was a deliberate strategic choice by Bird. He candidly admits that he never pitched the concept to his former colleagues because he felt it fell outside the studio\u2019s traditional \u201cwheelhouse.\u201d Pixar is world-renowned for its ability to cater to family audiences, and Bird was keenly aware of the brand expectations associated with the label. \u201cIf you put a Pixar label on it, people would go, \u2018Oh well, it\u2019s meant for the same audience that these other films were meant for,\u2019\u201d Bird explains. \u201cAnd inevitably, some of them would go, \u2018Well, my little Jimmy would be unhappy at this.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Bird views this as a systemic issue within the animation industry. He notes that while there are \u201c10 billion animated films\u201d produced for children, there is a distinct lack of animated content designed specifically for teenagers and adults, despite that demographic making up a substantial portion of the movie-going public. He argues that producing animated films for mature audiences \u201cshouldn\u2019t be a controversial decision,\u201d yet it was a concept that frequently met resistance from the \u201cministers of resource allocation\u201d at his former studio. Despite this creative friction, Bird maintains a strong relationship with his roots, as he is set to return to Pixar for a third <em>Incredibles<\/em> film.<\/p>\n<p>For now, however, his focus remains on <em>Ray Gunn<\/em>. When asked about the level of involvement from Skydance CEO David Ellison, who serves as a producer on the film, Bird notes that while Ellison was very hands-on in the early stages, his focus naturally shifted as his responsibilities grew\u2014a subtle nod to the intense corporate maneuvering surrounding Ellison\u2019s efforts to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery. When pressed on the broader implications of Skydance\u2019s expansion, including promises of high-volume theatrical output, Bird remains a pragmatist, steering clear of the boardroom politics. \u201cAll that stuff is beyond my pay grade,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"article-inline-figure\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/variety.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Ray-Gunn-Michael-Giacchino-and-Brad-Bird.jpg?w=1000\" alt=\"Brad Bird on Why He Took \u2018Ray Gunn\u2019 to Skydance Instead of Pixar: Making Animated Films for Teens and Adults \u2018Shouldn\u2019t Be a Controversial Decision\u2019\" class=\"article-inline-img\" loading=\"lazy\" \/><\/figure>\n<p>This pragmatism has been a hallmark of Bird\u2019s career. He reflects on his transition from the world of traditional hand-drawn animation\u2014where he helmed <em>The Iron Giant<\/em>\u2014to the \u201csexy new CG\u201d of Pixar. He recalls that many of his former colleagues were initially frustrated by his move, viewing it as a betrayal of the craft. \u201cAnd I said I don\u2019t really care about the technology part,\u201d Bird recounts. \u201cI\u2019m going up to Pixar because they protect storytelling.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That commitment to protecting the narrative is central to <em>Ray Gunn<\/em>, which stars Sam Rockwell as the titular private investigator tasked with unraveling a complex conspiracy involving a superstar singer, Venus Nova, voiced by Scarlett Johansson. For composer Michael Giacchino, the challenge was to create a score that mirrors the film\u2019s narrative web of intrigue without spoiling the mystery for the audience. \u201cProbably the second toughest thing was just making sure everything was always in alignment thematically, so that I didn\u2019t give the audience something that they shouldn\u2019t be thinking about,\u201d Giacchino explains. He notes that the most difficult sequence was an intimate, emotional beat between the two leads that required a precise, delicate musical touch.<\/p>\n<p>Although the screenplay for <em>Ray Gunn<\/em> was written nearly thirty years ago, Bird asserts that the core themes\u2014corporate greed, the intersection of art and technology, and the nature of human ambition\u2014remain as relevant today as they were in the late 1990s. The script, he claims, has changed \u201cless than you\u2019d think\u201d throughout its long journey to the screen. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cA lot of the things that people are saying that the film is dealing with that are contemporary right now in the headlines were in there 30 years ago,\u201d Bird observes. \u201cPeople are people and greed is greed, and the flaws of people make good subject material for films. If that\u2019s what\u2019s driving the story, then the story\u2019s not going to age because it\u2019s about eternal things rather than things that were in the news last week.\u201d As the orchestra reaches the final crescendo in the cavernous room at Abbey Road, it is clear that Bird has finally found the right space for his noir vision to resonate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On a balmy April afternoon, the hallowed air of Abbey Road Studios\u2019 Studio One\u2014a space that has hosted everyone from Edward Elgar to Harry Styles\u2014is filled with the sweeping, complex textures of a 74-piece orchestra. Violinists, cellists, flautists, and an organist are meticulously working through the score for Ray Gunn, a long-gestating feature animation from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2717,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[512],"tags":[4790,2218,4789,4788,514,513,4172,757,515,840,1993,625],"class_list":["post-2718","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-entertainment-and-culture","tag-abbey","tag-awaited","tag-bird","tag-brad","tag-culture","tag-entertainment","tag-gunn","tag-long","tag-movies","tag-road","tag-shape","tag-takes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2718","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2718"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2718\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2718"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2718"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/xesi.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2718"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}